@jackroberts____: engaged followers analysis

01 Follower quality

Nothing in the counts points to bought followers.

Healthy

Engagement: 1.1× the median per follower among 460 creators with 50k-100k followers.
Reach: 1.5× the median views per follower for creators this size.
Growth: No jump without likes in 4 follower counts since 11 Oct 2026.

Read from public counts: engagement and reach against creators of the same size, and follower counts beside lifetime likes over the last year. Follower lists cannot be read, so this is a verdict, not a count.

02 Who shows up

91% of the engaged followers we could read write in English.

Country they post from

United States 22%
United Kingdom 12%
Germany 4%
Nigeria 4%
Netherlands 3%
Australia 3%

Where each one's latest public video was posted, not proof of where they live. Shares of the 578 placed. 379 could not be placed (40%).

Not enough engaged followers say where they live to show cities.

Languages

English 91%
Indonesian 3%
Chinese 2%
French <1%
Latvian <1%

Shares of the 881 whose language we could read.

Age and gender

Shares of the 253 whose gender we could read.

22% Women

78% Men

0% 55+ 6%
4% 45-54 15%
7% 35-44 26%
25% 25-34 29%
64% 13-24 23%

Each side is a share of the 56 women or the 189 men whose age we could estimate. Mostly estimated from profile pictures, some from the ages followers state. They are a small share of the engaged followers we sampled, so read this as a rough guide.

03 Are they real?

Most engaged followers look real: 6% look suspicious.

6% suspicious accounts among the engaged followers

Audience authenticity: Genuine

Of the engaged followers' public profiles, 4% are empty and 16% follow 1,500 or more accounts.

Reach and engagement look natural.

04 What they say

In their own words, under @jackroberts____'s videos.

how many tokens does it eat up?

I've been using Kimi for months now and it's amazing

That plugin is not found when I search for it

This guys deserves a statue

has anyone used this?

05 What they love and want

48% of engaged followers talk about tech.

Interests share of engaged followers

Other includes Music 2% · Photography 2% · Film and TV 2% and smaller interests.

Brands they talk about

23% of engaged followers name a brand.

Claude ×65
ChatGPT ×11
Google ×10
Gemini ×9
Codex ×8
Grok ×6
Kimi ×6
GPT ×5
WorkBeaver ×4
Antigravity ×3
OBS ×3
Proofademic ×3
Replit ×3
gen.pro ×3

Notable fans

Engaged followers with large followings of their own.

@googlegemini 1.7M followers
@yoitsram 899K followers
@ifgodprovides 161K followers
@ace_carter69 82.5K followers
@hindriixx 52.1K followers
@madnox92 50.1K followers
@a0yy3 42.7K followers
@umbra.caelum 42.6K followers

06 How they perform

Half of the 20 videos we read passed 5.6K views.

Over 20 recent videos, 15 Sep 2026 to 30 Sep 2026.

Engagement rate 6% Likes, comments and shares per view
Engagement per follower 0.42% Likes, comments and shares per follower, median video
Likes per video 284 Median of 20 videos, mean 4K
Comments per video 5 Median of 20 videos, mean 18
Views per video 5.6K Median of 20 videos, mean 68.8K

Top 47% for engagement among creators with 50k-100k followers.

07 Who already works with them

2 of the last 20 videos are brand partnerships.

Each carries a paid partnership label or a disclosure tag.

Counted over the 20 most recent videos we hold, 15 Sep 2026 to 30 Sep 2026, about 15 days.

15 Sep 2026 Paid Organic 30 Sep 2026

Brands and creators featured

CodeRabbit Paid · 1
VEED Paid · 1

Hashtags they use most

#claude 6
#opensource 6
#aiagents 4
#aivideo 4
#claudeskills 4
#aitools 3
#claudecode 3
#aicoding 2
#chatgpt 2
#gemini 2
#jev 2
#productlaunch 2

Across every video of theirs we hold, not only the recent ones.

08 Best fit for

Best fit for AI tools.

AI tools

09 How we measure

We take a sample of 957 followers who commented on @jackroberts____'s recent videos: their most engaged followers, not a random sample of all their followers. Reading every follower would mean opening 79.7K profile pages, one by one.
To check the accounts behind the comments and estimate age and gender, we also opened the profiles of 957 engaged followers; 754 were public.
A chart that would rest on fewer than 30 people is not drawn.
With 957 people, 19 times in 20 a share on this page is within ±3 points of what all their engaged followers would show. That margin covers chance only, not engaged followers compared with followers who only watch.
Each chart is a share of the people it could place, so a chart on fewer people has a wider margin. The smallest here, the women's ages (56 people), is within ±13 points.
The engaged followers come from the comments on 200 videos, 17 Oct 2025 to 30 Sep 2026. Performance and brand collaborations use the 20 newest, 15 Sep 2026 to 30 Sep 2026.
Comments came back on 116 of those 200 videos.
Each country is where that person's latest public video was posted, as TikTok records it on the video. It shows where they post from, not proof of where they live. Where it gives none, we read what the person says about themselves.
Country comes from where each engaged follower's latest public video was posted; where that gives none, from what they say about themselves and the language they comment in. Country, city, language, gender and age shares are of the people we could place, and each chart says how many that is; anyone we cannot place is counted as not placed.
Age comes mostly from profile pictures, which cannot reliably tell a 17-year-old from an 18-year-old, so we show it in wide bands.
Authenticity compares engagement and reach with creators of the same size, and checks the engaged followers for signs of automation.
Interests and brands come from engaged followers' own words, read with AI analysis. Numbers are shares of all engaged followers.
Every figure is an aggregate. Followers are never named, except public accounts with a large following.
Audience figures are estimates.